Andrew Wyeth, Maine, 1983. Photo by Bruce Weber.

For me, as a lover of stark contrasts, vibrant color blocks, and broad, sweeping brushstrokes, his paintings should have felt dull and monochromatic. My breath, perpetually caught in the frantic pace of modern life, should not have slowed down to contemplate the quiet rhythm of his rural subjects, where nothing ever seems to happen. And my eyes, oversaturated by journeys to the world’s most vivid places, should not have filled with tears at the sight of landscapes the color of parched straw.

Andrew Wyeth, Distant Thunder, 1961. Tempera on panel.

Andrew Wyeth, Winter 1946, 1946. Tempera on panel.

Andrew Wyeth, Chambered Nautilus, 1956. Tempera and watercolor on dry brush.

Andrew Wyeth, Master Bedroom, 1985. Watercolor on paper.

Yet, that is exactly what happened - out of all the masterpieces in art history, almost all his paintings and, in particular, “Wind from the Sea” have become one of the most poignant ones.

Almost instantly, I recognized something deeply familiar in the dry grass of Pennsylvania, the rugged landscapes, and the quiet lives of Maine—places Wyeth hardly ever left throughout his life. It felt as though I had stumbled upon a map of my own terra incognita—a barren, inner territory I had always been too afraid to visit. To protect myself from further pain, it had always felt safer to forget that this land existed, and never return.

Andrew Wyeth, Wind from the Sea, 1947. Tempera on panel.

In the summer of 1947, Wyeth climbed into a long-abandoned room on the third floor of the Olson House in Cushing, Maine—a room where objects lay buried beneath decades of undisturbed dust. Its owner, Christina Olson, one of his most frequent models, lived with a degenerative muscular disorder that had taken away her ability to walk. A year later, she would become the subject of his most famous painting, Christina’s World.

Andrew Wyeth, Christina's World, 1948. Tempera on gessoed panel.

Wyeth forced open the wooden window. Resistant at first, as though asleep for decades, it finally yielded, and a sharp, crisp wind from the Atlantic pierced the room’s suffocating stillness.

The Olson House, Maine. Photo by Keith Dotson.

“It was hot in there, and I opened the window, and all of a sudden this wind blew the curtain, which hadn’t been moved for about thirty years. Gosh, it was fantastic! That thin crocheted net rose from the dusty floor so fast, it wasn’t like a wind, it was like a ghost, a spirit given an exit...”, - Wyeth later recalled.

In his notes, he reflected that the sturdy window frame symbolized Christina’s inner steel—her willpower, the stubbornness that held her life together despite her failing body. The lace—torn, stained, and worn down to little more than cheesecloth—became a metaphor for her physical decay, for the fragility of the human body itself. The birds, frozen in the pattern of the cheap fabric, represented her youth and a spirit trapped, yet desperate to break free.

The birds...

It is with them that my own reading of Wyeth’s symbolism begins to diverge. They are not frozen to me. As the lace surges in the sudden gust of ocean air, these embroidered birds, caught by the wind, seem to take flight—coming alive and reclaiming their long-awaited freedom.

The gust of wind wasn’t just a fleeting breeze breaking thirty years of stillness, nor merely a metaphor for death—it was the first sign of life returning.

The birds take over.

My eyes catch on their embroidered wings, and I follow them—out through the window, beyond the frame, down the dirt road. As I walk across this dry grass and sun-scorched earth in my mind, I begin to feel the life beneath my feet. I remember what life feels like. Life. It has never vanished. I see the Ocean.

To heal, I only needed to step into my most abandoned, terrifying inner room, stand still by the window, and find the courage to turn the handle. I needed to let that fresh gust of wind brush against my skin, allowing long-dormant birds to finally take flight.

And I can feel those birds, even now, beating their wings against my ribcage.

The painting’s deeply muted, earthy palette tells me that hope does not always arrive as a raging fire. Sometimes it reveals itself in the ordinary, in the familiar. Healing does not have to begin with a heroic act; it can start with something as quiet as a faint, unfamiliar coolness against the skin, or a subtle shift in the air.

Perhaps that quiet shift was enough.

Christina Olson, despite the brutal progression of her paralysis and medicine’s grim predictions, went on to defy her diagnosis, living a long, stubborn life into her late seventies. Wyeth painted a tragedy of confinement, but I think his hands, perhaps unconsciously, also captured the moment survival begins to take over.

Christina Olson and Andrew Wyeth at the Olson House, Maine, 1951. Photo by Kosti Ruohomaa.

I feel the birds. I hear the Ocean…

P.S. Andrew Wyeth’s 'Wind from the Sea' (1947) is a tempera on hardboard masterpiece measuring 18 1/2 x 27 9/16 inches. The painting is currently preserved and on display in the permanent collection of the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C.

P.P.S. This is how that window and that room look now. Breathtaking, isn't it?

More for curious minds:

• The Olson House: A Photographer’s Visit in Search of a Painter’s Inspiration

• View the Olson House Virtually in 3D (highly recommended!)

The Paragone is ad-free, AI-free, and written entirely by one loving, passionate human—me. If my work touches your heart, please consider supporting it with a donation to help keep it alive and thriving. If you already do, I am deeply grateful.

Support

Share

Edvard Munch, Melancholy (c. 1892)

There is an interesting paradox in our enchantment with art - we admire beauty, but we are often enchanted by pain.

A technically flawless landscape may impress us. A perfectly balanced still life painting may calm us. And a pair of lovers, captured in romantic languor, may inspire us. But if paintings are filled with pain, loneliness, grief, despair or adversity — they may get stuck in our thoughts, and we return to them again and again. We are convinced that they possess something “deeper”.

But what exactly is that “deeper”? Is depicted pain itself compelling? Or do we just believe that great art must be born from great suffering?

For centuries, our culture has celebrated the figure of a tortured genius. We are told the stories of Vincent van Gogh cutting off his ear, Edvard Munch haunted by illness and death, Egon Schiele confronting anxiety and mortality, Frida Kahlo transforming physical agony into visual language. Their biographies have become almost inseparable from their paintings.

Sometimes it is difficult to know whether we are fascinated by the work or the myth surrounding it.

Psychology suggests that our fascination with artists’ suffering may run much deeper than cultural storytelling.

Vincent van Gogh, At Eternity's Gate (1890)

Why Does Pain Become a Proof of Authenticity in Art?

In an age saturated with perfectly constructed online identities, authenticity has become one of the rarest emotional currencies.

We know that social media is filtered. Social beliefs are curated. Even vulnerability is often strategically performed, becoming a next-level marketing stunt. We instinctively feel and distrust it. It seems so artificial, and we do not believe it because we do not recognize ourselves — daily life human beings.

And against all of this extraversive performance, suffering appears almost impossible to fake.

Psychologists have observed that people associate emotional pain with authenticity and sincerity. Someone who openly exposes grief, anxiety, or despair seems to have no reason to deceive us. Whether this assumption is objectively true or not, it shapes how we perceive artists. When we discover that a painting emerged from genuine life struggles, we often begin to see the work differently. The colors, composition, and brushstrokes no longer feel merely expressive; they become evidence of the artist’s pain.

This phenomenon is related to what psychologists call perceived authenticity — our tendency to value works that appear to reveal an artist’s life. And in art, through the pain, we are often searching not for perfection, but for proof that another human being has truly lived.

Frida Kahlo, The Wounded Deer (1946)

The Tortured Genius Myth: Art as Psychological Sublimation

But pain by itself creates nothing - it can just as easily destroy a life as inspire one. What fascinates us is not suffering itself, but transformation. In psychoanalytic theory, this process is known as sublimation — the ability to redirect overwhelming emotional energy into creative expression. The artist performs something remarkably close to alchemy. Fear becomes color. Grief becomes composition. Chaos becomes rhythm. Something deeply private is transformed into something another person, decades or even centuries later, can experience.

Friedrich Nietzsche famously wrote: “We have art in order not to die of the truth.”

For the artist, creativity is often less an act of self-expression than an act of survival. By placing unbearable emotions onto canvas, they create distance from them. What was once overwhelming becomes observable. Pain ceases to be only an experience and becomes an object that can be shaped, examined, and perhaps even understood. And this transformation — not suffering itself — is the true miracle.

Edvard Munch, Night in Saint-Cloud, (1890)

The Tragedy Paradox: Why Looking at “Sad” Paintings Feels Comforting

If painful art reflects suffering, why do we actively seek it out? The answer lies in one of psychology’s most intriguing puzzles: the Tragedy Paradox - the mechanism of contemplating suffering in art, which is similar to the processes that occur within us when we voluntarily expose ourselves to stories, music, films, and paintings that evoke pain. Recent research in psychology and neuroaesthetics shows that such experience allows us to engage with sometimes unbearable emotions of our daily lives under conditions of complete safety. Unlike real grief, art cannot actually harm us. The painting creates emotional distance. We see our psychological struggles while simultaneously knowing we are safe.

Some researchers even suggest that viewing aesthetic representations of sadness may trigger physiological responses associated with comfort, empathy, and emotional regulation. And instead of leaving us emotionally depleted, tragic art often helps us process feelings that remain unresolved in our own lives. We are not simply witnessing someone else’s suffering. We are living out our own, in order to lessen the pain within. This may explain why certain paintings feel therapeutic - art becomes a psychological laboratory where fear, loneliness, loss, and mortality can be explored without their real-world consequences.

Andrew Wyeth, Christina's World, (1948)

The Dark Side of Romanticizing Mental Illness in Art

Yet our fascination with a “tragic art” has a dark side.

Western culture has romanticized the connection between creativity and mental illness for centuries. We learned to believe that depression produces masterpieces, trauma creates genius, and happiness somehow weakens artistic vision. But modern psychology paints a much more complicated picture. While adversity may provide powerful material, severe psychological distress often disrupts cognitive abilities that creativity depends upon — attention, memory, motivation, and sustained work.

Confusing the two risks glorifying illnesses that have destroyed countless lives while overlooking the immense discipline, resilience, and craftsmanship required to produce great art. Pain may provide the raw material, but it never guarantees the masterpiece. Many extraordinary artists created despite their suffering, not because of it. The real achievement was never the pain. It was the ability to transform pain into meaning.

And their example gives us great hope that, despite pain — or together with it— we are still capable of creating something beautiful. That our pain is not in vain. That our deepest wounds do not have to pause our life stories but can instead be transformed into a remedy for us and, perhaps, others.

So, next time you stand before Van Gogh’s The Starry Night — painted from memory inside an asylum, during one of the darkest periods of his life — look past the swirling sky and the myth. What you are looking at is not proof that suffering produces genius. It is evidence of a mind reaching for order, for beauty, for meaning, even as everything around it was breaking apart. His genius was never the pain itself. It was his refusal to let the pain have the final word.

Vincent van Gogh, The Starry Night (1889)

Support

Share

Further Reflections from Our Archive:

How Does Having an Original Painting at Home Help to Decrease Cognitive Exhaustion?

How to Buy Original Paintings Online Safely

How to negotiate a price when buying art?

Anas Albraehe, The Dream Catcher, 2018

Buying original paintings online has become a normal part of collecting. While the post-pandemic surge in digital sales has moderated, online transactions still account for a significant share of the global art market. According to the Art Basel & UBS Global Art Market Report, online art sales reached $9.2 billion in 2025, representing around 15% of the market and remaining well above pre-pandemic levels.

However, this growth brings challenges in online purchasing. Artsy’s Art Market Trends 2025 report shows that 69% of collectors have hesitated to purchase art due to a lack of transparency, authenticity, and condition verification, as well as hidden costs.

Drawing on our experience as collectors and our knowledge of common pitfalls, we want to help art buyers navigate key moments when buying original paintings online safely.

How to Tell if an Online Painting Is Original

The Giclée Trap (How to Spot a Fake Original Painting)

With the rise of high-end digital printing, a shady practice has appeared: selling “original mixed media paintings” that are often just high-quality digital prints (Giclée) on canvas with a few real brushstrokes of oil or acrylic paint added to fake handwork. You think you are buying an original, but are actually buying a poster with a small touch-up.

We would recommend always requesting close-up, macro photos, or video clips of the artwork shot from a 45-degree angle. A genuine original painting has an uneven, organic, and beautifully chaotic surface. If the painting appears perfectly flat except for two or three suspiciously thick strokes, you may be looking at an enhanced print.

The Daylight Test (How to Verify Artwork Colors)

When photos of paintings are posted online, they are processed to look as attractive as possible. In addition, mobile phone and computer screens distort true colors and tones.

Before buying, ask the seller to send an unedited smartphone video of the artwork, shot in indirect natural daylight, such as on an overcast day or next to a window without direct sun. A moving video shot under flat, honest light will show how the colors behave in a real space and how light plays on the brushstroke texture.

Fortunately, most artworks seem better in person because no photo or video can capture the energy and feelings the artist put into it. But there are exceptions.

Should You Buy Framed or Unframed Art Online?

When buying art online, you often face a choice: purchase the artwork raw or pay extra for the artist or gallery to frame it. While receiving a ready-to-hang piece seems convenient, it is often a logistical and financial challenge for the buyer and a mental nightmare for the artist.

The Hidden Costs of Shipping Framed Art

Framing adds weight and volume to the package. A heavy wooden frame with glass requires a specialized heavy-duty crate. This means you will pay double or triple for shipping across borders. Shipping framed art also carries a high risk of glass breaking in transit, which can permanently scratch and ruin the painting underneath.

Our sincere advice: buy the artwork unframed — stretched canvas, canvas boards, or paper works shipped safely in a heavy-duty tube. It is significantly cheaper, far lower risk, and much less hassle.

Personal Style vs. Ready Frames

Art framing is deeply personal. A frame that looks good in an artist’s studio or in a gallery might completely clash with your home interior.

Buy the clean artwork and take it to your local framing shop. Choosing the passepartout, glass, and frame yourself is a classic collecting ritual and ensures the piece fits your space perfectly.

Very often, according to artists, coordinating framing with a buyer turns into a nightmare. The artist spends a great deal of unpaid time selecting options that the collector rarely approves on the first attempt.

Is 100% Prepayment Safe When Buying Art Online?

When buying art, payment terms always arise. For a first-time collector, being asked to transfer money up front can feel uncomfortable. We understand that. But established market norms remain unchanged.

Ready-to-Ship Art vs. Commissioned Art Pricing

If the artwork is finished and sitting in the artist’s studio or gallery, 100% prepayment is often the standard rule. Art sellers, like independent creators, may not be able to ship valuable, fragile goods worldwide without being paid first.

The Exception (Commissions): The rule changes if you order a custom piece. Never pay 100% upfront. The standard practice is a 50% deposit before the artist begins work, with the remaining 50% due after you approve the final result via video.

Essential Art Paperwork: Certificates, Invoices, and Contracts

When purchasing original art online, documentation is often your primary financial and legal shield. Many novice buyers ignore this, assuming paperwork is only for multi-million dollar museum pieces. In reality, proper documentation can define your piece’s secondary market value.

The Certificate of Authenticity (COA)

Without a Certificate of Authenticity, your painting may be treated as a colored canvas. A COA is important for resale, insurance claims, or estate valuation. However, a generic paper printed at home holds no weight.

A valid COA should be issued and signed by the artist, their authorized representative, or the gallery. It should include the artist’s name, exact title, year of creation, exact dimensions, and specific medium and materials. For digital security, modern artists often add a unique inventory number or tamper-proof hologram. Always verify that a physical COA is included in the shipping box.

Do You Need a Formal Sales Contract?

The necessity of a formal bill of sale depends heavily on the price of the piece.

If you buy artwork over €2,000, a formal purchase agreement outlining copyright retention, resale rights, and condition reports is standard. For pieces under €1,000, formal contracts are rarely used. The modern online art market at this level runs on mutual trust, public reputation, and clear, direct messages — an “Gentleman’s Agreement”.

Creating a Secure Payment Trail

You do not need a 20-page contract for a €500 painting, but you should establish a strong digital record of the transaction.

The Card-to-Card Issue: Many independent artists prefer direct card-to-card transfers or peer-to-peer services like Zelle, Venmo, or SEPA wire transfers. For a buyer, this can be a financial trap. Banks often treat these transactions as personal gifts. If the seller disappears or the artwork arrives damaged, you may have limited buyer protection and may not be able to dispute the charge. Furthermore, a personal transfer gives you no official receipt to show customs.

To protect yourself, always insist on a formal commercial invoice issued through trusted gateways like Stripe, PayPal Business, or Shopify. The seller might pay a small processing fee, but this invoice lists the artwork title and the agreed-upon shipping terms. It serves as your official receipt for customs and provides buyer protection if the package is lost.

Hidden Costs of Buying Art Online: Shipping, Insurance, and Taxes

The price you see on screen is rarely the price you actually pay. To avoid unpleasant surprises, calculate the total cost of ownership before entering your credit card details.

Art Logistics: Crating Fees and Fine Art Insurance

An original painting cannot simply be shipped in a standard cardboard box with bubble wrap. Large artworks usually require specialized wooden crates built by hand.

The possible trap here is that some sellers list a painting for $1,500 but later charge a separate $400 invoice for crating and handling. Always ask the seller for a fixed shipping and crating quote before paying for the artwork.

The Insurance Rule: Standard carrier insurance often caps luxury items and may not cover fine art. Always ask the seller: “Is this shipment fully covered under a dedicated fine art insurance policy for the full purchase value?” If not, expect to pay an extra 1–2% of the artwork’s value for proper coverage.

Cross-Border Return Policies and Customs Duties

If you are an American collector buying a painting from an artist based in Berlin or London, you are entering international customs territory.

Customs Duties: In the US, original art generally falls under Chapter 97 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, which means it is often duty-free. However, customs processing fees and brokerage charges still apply. The golden rule: the buyer is usually legally responsible for import taxes, not the artist.

The Return Challenge: Under EU law, online buyers have a strict 14-day window to return goods for any reason. Independent US artists often apply a “final sale” policy. But here is the catch: even if a return is allowed, the buyer must cover the return shipping and crating costs. If you return a $2,000 painting, you might easily lose $500 just on the logistics of sending it back.

Buying original paintings online is a rewarding way to build a personal space that feels alive. It is an investment in your mental comfort and direct support for living creators. But true enjoyment of the purchase often starts right with the buying process itself. Follow our recommendations above, and your entry into the world of art will become a sophisticated ritual, rather than a risky gamble.

Happy collecting!

Yours,

The Paragone

Share

Photo by Tommao Wang, Unsplash.

The biggest mistake an art buyer can make is not overpaying. It is not choosing the wrong size, the wrong medium, or even the wrong artist. For someone buying original art to live with, rather than to hold as an investment asset, the biggest mistake is not trusting their own taste.

This is especially true for new collectors. Often, a private question appears once you realise you genuinely want a work: How do I know if this painting is actually good? Is it “worth loving”?

And this is where the biggest disappointments start.

According to the Hiscox Online Art Trade Report, 94% of art buyers named emotional benefits as a key motivation for purchase. People may speak about price, provenance, and market context, but the first impulse is often more intimate: the work has to do something to them. This feeling cannot be rationally explained, and even less can it justify the sometimes high price of a worthy original painting. So we begin to devalue it, searching for justification for our suddenly swollen feelings toward the painting.

Is it too beautiful? Too emotional? Too simple? Too strange? What if the artist is not known enough? Not represented by a gallery? No auction history, museum exhibition, recognized collectors, or polished CV? What if tomorrow someone more competent looks at the work and says, “Are you crazy for buying this?”

At that moment, the question changes. You no longer ask, “What do I feel when I look at this work?” You ask, “Am I feeling correctly? Am I right to like this? Or do I simply not understand art well enough?”

Collector Anxiety

Among art-market professionals, there is a commonly used term for this phenomenon: “collector anxiety”.

It is usually described in practical terms: the fear of overpaying, buying at the wrong moment, misunderstanding provenance, choosing the wrong gallery, or purchasing an artist without a future market.

But the deepest layer of collector anxiety is not financial. It is personal.

The major fear is buying the “wrong” art.

Price can be rationalised. You can compare dimensions, medium, career stage, exhibition history, demand, and recent sales. You can ask whether the number makes sense. Taste cannot be rationalized in the same way.

A buyer’s taste is not a decorative preference detached from life. It forms over years through memory, class, education, love, longing, shame, aspiration, loneliness, beauty, fear, rooms one has lived in, books one has read, places one has left, and versions of oneself one still hopes to become. Taste exposes us far more than budget does. It shows what kind of beauty disarms us, what kind of strangeness feels true, what colours calm us, what images return us to something we may not have named for a long time.

And saying, “I like this artwork”, can sometimes feel dangerously close to saying: “This is what I need right now. This is me”.

That is why taste can be more frightening than price. We are often unsure of ourselves and our choices, especially when it comes to something as honest as art. Taste in art exposes us, making us vulnerable to judgment and longing for external approval.

The Art Market Offers Expertise. We Buy Permission.

The art market understands this vulnerability very well. Don Thompson, in The $12 Million Stuffed Shark, quotes Howard Rutkowski, formerly a specialist at Sotheby’s and later a director at Bonhams, who put it bluntly: “Never underestimate how insecure buyers are about contemporary art, and how much they always need reassurance.”

Much of the market is built around that need. Gallery representation, fair participation, auction history, museum acquisitions, waiting lists, institutional interest, press coverage, the right collectors, advisors, and price all function as external supports for the anxious buyer. The more expensive the work, the more elaborate the architecture of reassurance.

This does not mean that such signals are meaningless. Expertise matters. Context matters. A serious gallery can help build an artist’s career responsibly. A good dealer can explain why one work is stronger than another. An informed advisor can help a collector understand whether the price is reasonable, whether the work belongs to an important series, whether the practice is coherent, and whether the purchase is being made under transparent conditions. No one should buy art in a complete vacuum, especially when real money is involved.

But all these rituals have to support your choice.

We often believe we are looking for knowledge when we are actually asking for sanction. Expertise helps us see better; permission relieves us from the responsibility of seeing for ourselves. Expertise gives tools. Permission does something else. It tells us: now you may want this because someone else has already approved it.

Why Unrecognized Artists Frighten New Collectors

This is why buying art from an unrecognized or not-yet-institutionalized artist can feel psychologically difficult. When an artist has been accepted by the system, the buyer is protected. The gallery becomes a shield. The auction record becomes an argument. The museum exhibition becomes insurance. Even if the work does not fully move you, it can still be defended: this is an important artist; they are represented by a serious gallery; people are already buying them; the market has spoken.

In other words, the buyer is not alone. Someone else has already looked first.

But when an artist has not yet reached that moment — before institutional recognition, a strong gallery, auction visibility, or market validation — the collector occupies a more exposed position. There is less to hide behind. To buy the work is to say: I see value here before it has been officially confirmed for me. “I can hear the sound of violins, long before it begins…”. Remember? This is it.e real moments of collecting. Not the purchase of value once it has been fully explained, but the ability to recognize life in a work before the market has made it safe.

One survey found that 58% of collectors are more motivated by the subject matter and story behind an individual work than by the artist’s background or career. Yet when anxiety enters, the hierarchy often reverses. The story that moved us suddenly feels less important than the CV that can protect us.

This does not mean romanticizing obscurity. An unknown artist is not automatically important, and an emotional reaction is not enough on its own. But the fear of buying outside established validation reveals something essential: the collector is not only evaluating the artist. They are also confronting their own capacity to see.

The most interesting collections have rarely been built by people who only bought what was beyond dispute. Herbert and Dorothy Vogel, a New York couple — a postal clerk and a librarian who became legendary collectors despite modest incomes — built one of the most admired collections of conceptual and minimalist art in the United States by buying directly from artists when much of the work they collected had little broad commercial appeal. Remembering an early acquisition of Sol LeWitt, Herb Vogel said: “I knew something was new. I didn’t know how good or bad it was; I just knew it hadn’t been done before.”

That is not the language of market certainty. It is the language of perception before validation.

The Worst Mistake Is Not Buying the Wrong Work

New collectors often imagine the worst mistake is buying the wrong artwork: a work that does not increase in value, an artist who never breaks through, something too decorative, emotional, naïve, or distant from the established conversation. But for someone buying art for the home, the more intimate mistake is different. It is walking away from the work that genuinely moved them and buying the one easier to justify.

A work with better language around it. Easier to explain at dinner. One that comes with a stronger institutional frame. One that looks more intelligent than your desire.

And then it hangs in your home.

Every day.

This is especially serious because many buyers are not purchasing art for storage, speculation, or distant resale. Data show that 71% of collectors buy art to decorate their homes, while 67% say they buy it to inspire their daily lives. If the work is meant to live with you every day, buying something you do not truly love is not a small compromise. It is a daily one.

An unloved painting at home is very heavy. At minimum, it may look wrong. At most, it will ruin your daily life because it will drain you visually and psychologically. A desired, beloved work hanging on the wall at home can nourish us and change our lives.

Where Real Collecting Begins

This is why mature collecting begins before the purchase.

It begins before the invoice, certificate, framing, shipping, and even before the moment of decision.

It begins when an art buyer stops being ashamed of their own response to an artwork and asks themselves: “Does the work still hold my attention after the first encounter? Can I imagine living with it, not merely displaying it?”

Taste in art begins, first of all, with accepting yourself and your preferences. With self-trust. And then it becomes knowledge and self-development. We look at a beloved work, and even years later, it can reveal something new each time — about us, about itself, about the artist.

Through beloved art, we learn, grow, change, make mistakes and accept mistakes, but first of all — we remain ourselves.

The worst mistake an art buyer can make is not buying the wrong work…

It is betraying the one that truly moved us. Betraying ourselves.

Happy collecting.

Yours,

The Paragone.

The hour of uncertainty. The hour when we freeze, unsure what we will see as the light changes and the object becomes more tangible. A wolf, or a dog?

This feels familiar, doesn’t it? Especially in recent years, when the past — perhaps not ideal, but at least understandable — no longer works, while the future frightens us with its terrifying uncertainty.

It is this state of in-betweenness — between past and future, between the familiar and the unknown — that Canadian artist Michelle Paterok returns to again and again. And there is something we can learn from the way she lives through this uncertainty and transforms her view of it.

Michelle Paterok, photo by Anahi Gonzalez

Reality Through Light

Uncertainty is uncertain itself. Everything depends on the optics, the prism through which we view it. For Michelle Paterok, that prism is light.

In her work, light is not simply a painterly device. It is a marker of the artist’s relationship to uncertainty at each stage of her journey. Whether she fears it, moves toward it, or begins to discern something new within it — all of this can be read through the character of the light.

When the light is dusky and cold, blurring the edges of things, it makes uncertainty frightening, pushing us into the unstable state of entre chien et loup. When it is warm, transparent, and spacious, it turns fear of the unknown into anticipation and curiosity. We no longer want to leave uncertainty. We do not mind staying a little longer because it has become inviting, almost comforting.

This movement — from dusk to warmth, from rejection to willingness to continue — runs through the chronology of Michelle’s series.

The Journey: Light as a Marker of Initiation

At Dusk (2022) — twilight marks anxious uncertainty. The world is tangible but indistinct. At Dusk, Waiting, Bathroom Mirror — the titles suggest suspension: something is about to happen, but what remains unclear. Old ways of seeing no longer work. Light does not help; it disorients.

To Neither Quite Belonging (2023) — uncertainty becomes existential. The series takes its title from Rainer Maria Rilke’s poem At Sundown:

You watch how gradually the landscape’s contours change,
some rising heavenward as others downward fall;
leaving you alone, to neither quite belonging.

“To belong neither here nor there” is no longer about an external situation but an inner state. The light remains crepuscular, but within it appears a strange permission: not to have an answer, to stand on the threshold without crossing it.

By Quiet Light (2024) and through Summer’s Edge (2025) and Towards Silence (2026), the shift becomes clear. The light grows calmer, warmer, and more transparent. Uncertainty does not disappear but changes its nature: no longer a danger to escape, but a territory of curiosity, sensation, and quiet attention. It settles on flowers, fruit, rooms, objects, and the edges of the home. What once felt disorienting now becomes inviting and compelling.

The Paragone Take

The initiation Michelle Paterok undergoes is not about defeating uncertainty. It is about how a change in optics changes experience. The same blurred horizon appears in twilight and frightens us. Seen in warmth, it begins to draw us in.

Light becomes not simply a painterly device, but an instrument for relating to reality. For anyone who feels caught entre chien et loup, the central lesson is: uncertainty does not change.

What changes is the light through which we look at it. That may be the only thing we can truly choose.

Michelle does not run from uncertainty. She stays inside it long enough to see her relationship to it change.

For a collector, living with Paterok’s work means living with this quiet reminder: the world need not become clear before we can stay with it. What changes is not always the horizon itself, but the light through which we see it.

Collector’s Guide: Why Look at Paterok Now

From a collecting perspective, Paterok occupies a compelling position. She is not an artist without context. She has developed a clear visual language, built a consistent body of work, and exhibited across Canada and the United States. Her practice explores recognisable themes — dusk, memory, domestic space, flowers, atmosphere — yet never feels repetitive. It reads as an unfolding investigation with clear collector appeal.

This matters. For a first-time collector, the question is not only whether a work is beautiful but also whether the artist has a visual language strong enough to develop over time.

Paterok does.

Alongside the integrity and authenticity of her work, Paterok’s paintings carry a powerful emotional and psychological anchor — something increasingly rare today and especially meaningful for collectors.

Paterok’s paintings fall within a range that may be of interest to collectors working within €10,000, depending on size, series, and availability. If considering her work, look especially closely at pieces from At Dusk and To Neither Quite Belonging — some works from these series are still available.

Michelle’s website: https://www.michellepaterok.com/

Here Today Gone Tomorrow by Michelle Paterok

Hayffiield l, Exposición de cuadros en Rauma, Finlandia, Unsplash

Art is full of rituals. It wraps itself in mystique, guards its pricing, and acts as though beauty cannot be determined by something as vulgar as money. This leaves many new collectors wondering: is it acceptable to ask for a discount on something “priceless”? And if so, how?

The answer is yes, but there are nuances you should know before you ask.

Before we get into specifics, it helps to understand one fundamental difference between art and almost everything else you buy. There is no price list. No catalogue. No way to open another tab and find the same painting cheaper somewhere else — we are talking about original works. The price of a piece of art is always the result of multiple subjective factors: the artist’s reputation, the gallery’s standing, the timing, the provenance, and, ultimately, what a particular person is willing to pay for something that resists measurement. This makes the conversation about price both more complicated and more human than in almost any other industry.

So, let’s get straight to the point.

Discounts depend on where and how you are buying.

1. Buying directly from an artist

The most flexible option — whether you are buying through their website, Instagram, Saatchi Art as an individual seller, or at a personal exhibition. A 10–20% discount is realistic, especially if you are buying more than one work or paying in full upfront.

Interestingly, accomplished artists (not the same as popular ones) tend to price conservatively, leaving little room to negotiate. The better the artist, the less flexibility there usually is. They know the value of their work, and frankly — most artists dislike negotiating. Keep it brief, keep it respectful, and do not push.

2. Buying through online platforms (Artsy, Saatchi Art, etc.)

A quick distinction worth knowing: on Saatchi Art, artists usually sell directly. On Artsy, you are typically dealing with galleries, so the negotiation dynamics differ accordingly. With artists, see the section above; with galleries, see the section below. According to Artsy’s own data, around 74% of buyers who ask for a discount on their platform receive one, with an average of around 15% and discounts occasionally reaching 30%. Whether the work is listed at a fixed price or on request, it is always worth asking.

3. Buying directly through galleries or at art fairs

Art fairs are essentially galleries on the road — most booths are run by galleries, so the same rules apply in both contexts. At Art Basel 2025, galleries were offering reductions of 20–30% below asking price for works under $1 million. For smaller galleries and more affordable artworks, 10–15% is a standard and reasonable ask. One practical note: discounts during fairs tend to be lower, as galleries have invested significantly in their booth and arrive with higher expectations for demand. The best time to negotiate is between shows, when there is no urgency on either side. And avoid discussing discounts in front of the artist — it is awkward for everyone.

4. Buying through an art dealer or art advisor.

These two roles are often confused but work quite differently. An art dealer typically builds their margin into the asking price, so any discount usually comes out of their pocket — less room to move. An art advisor, on the other hand, works on your behalf, negotiating with galleries and dealers using relationships that a new collector simply does not have yet. Their fee — typically 10–15% — is paid by you on top of the sale price, but a good advisor can often more than offset this through better access and pricing. One important piece of advice: always ask your advisor directly how they are compensated. Some have undisclosed arrangements with galleries that can work against your interests. A trustworthy one will answer without hesitation.

If you are negotiating a discount with a middleman — whether it’s a gallery, an art dealer or an art advisor — keep in mind that the price cut is sometimes split with the artist, while other times it is absorbed entirely by the intermediary.

5. Buying at auction.

You do not negotiate at auction. But remember: the hammer price is not what you pay. Buyer’s premium — typically 25–28% — is added on top. Factor that in before you raise your hand.

Geography matters as well.

In the United States, asking for a 20% discount is completely normal — part of how business is done. In Europe, the standard is closer to 10–15%, and tone matters more than the number. What reads as confident in New York can come across as aggressive in Paris or London. Read the room.

How You Ask Matters More Than What You Ask

This is the part nobody writes about.

Artists often find discount requests genuinely painful — not out of greed, but because every work represents months of labour, doubt, and something deeply personal. A request to lower the price can feel like a devaluation of all of that. From the collector’s perspective, it is simply a search for a comfortable number. But the artist does not know that unless you tell them.

Which is why we would encourage you to ask yourself before you negotiate: why do I actually want a discount? Is it habit — the instinct to win a deal? Or is it a genuine question of finding a price that feels right? Because you are not buying a commodity. You are acquiring something with real psychological, emotional, and aesthetic weight — something you will live with every day. How you enter that process matters as much as the fact of owning the work.

Many artists care deeply not just about selling, but about who the work goes to, why the person wants it, and where it will live. When you explain why this particular piece matters to you, that is not a weak negotiating position. It is a form of respect for the artist’s work. And it is often precisely what opens up flexibility that a cold request for a discount never would.

This is where a price negotiation in art can become something more: the start of a relationship, and often the real beginning of collecting well.

Happy collecting.

Yours,

The Paragone

Six Blues by Donald Sultan, 2006.

The Crisis of Chronic Tiredness

We are a constantly tired generation. We get tired of work, the news, others' expectations, and our own standards. We even get tired of describing why we are so tired.

Yes, this seems to be what adult life is, and it requires a state of near-constant cognitive tension.

This is especially true for professionals whose work is tied to continuous problem-solving, rapid decision-making, and measurable outcomes. The mind learns to stay alert because almost everything around it requires an immediate, effective response.

When the human nervous system remains in this state of hyper-alertness without adequate decompression, its natural adaptive resources inevitably deplete. A person may still appear productive, competent, and in control, while internally feeling increasingly fragile, irritable, detached, or unable to recover properly.

Even after the laptop is closed, our minds remain switched on, unable to relax. This is one of the quiet crises of modern professional life: the body leaves work, but the nervous system does not.

The Limits of Standard Wellness Modalities

When facing chronic exhaustion, the instinctive response is often to treat the brain like an isolated machine requiring maintenance. High-achieving professionals frequently construct rigorous self-care routines: meditation applications, therapy, exercise, supplements, sleep tracking, and pharmaceutical support.

These tools can be valuable and, for many, necessary. However, they often focus on the mind as if it exists separately from the physical surroundings to which it returns every evening. This is where something vital is missed: the visual environment.

The visual environment matters because the psyche does not recover in isolated abstraction.

Even if we have had a very effective meditation or therapy session, it is always time to return to the physical world.

And since the eyes are among the most critical centers for gathering information and shaping our psyche, the visual surroundings play a vital role — what the eyes repeatedly perceive becomes part of the emotional climate of daily life. For instance, a cluttered, sterile, or visually aggressive environment can keep the nervous system in a state of low-grade tension, while a coherent, emotionally resonant environment can signal safety, continuity, and rest.

If the home environment lacks sensory depth, the eye has nowhere to rest. The brain remains trapped in the same rigid visual vocabulary that drives its fatigue during the working day: screens, notifications, documents, dashboards, artificial light, and flat digital surfaces.

The Human Need for a Safe Harbor

In environmental psychology, a restorative place refers to a physical environment that helps the body shift from vigilance to recovery. [1]

When the workday is defined by invisible metrics, abstract pressure, and digital overload, the human brain suffers from a form of sensory deprivation. It does not need more stimulation; it needs a different kind — slower, richer, quieter, and more embodied.

A home cannot merely serve as a functional holding space between working hours. At its best, it becomes a psychological environment that helps the nervous system return to itself. This is where the presence of authentic, physical art shifts into a meaningful tool for emotional restoration. Not as a replacement for therapy or a medical cure, but as part of a daily environment that helps the mind soften, reorient, and recover. Let’s explore how looking at art can lower stress levels and why original art is better for mental health than digital prints.

The Neurobiology of Visual Restoration

Integrating art into a living space introduces several psychologically restorative qualities:

The Phenomenon of Soft Fascination

Environmental psychologists use the term “soft fascination” to describe a state in which attention is gently held by something that does not demand problem-solving. This is entirely different from professional attention, which is sharp, instrumental, and goal-oriented, constantly asking what must be fixed, answered, or completed. [2]

A painting asks for another kind of attention. When observing it, the eye moves across the physical surface: the thickness of brushstrokes, the subtle layers of pigment, the movement of color, and the interaction of light and shadow. The mind is engaged but not forced; it is invited to stay without being required to perform. This looking can be deeply restorative because it allows the brain to remain awake without being under pressure. The mind does not always need to be emptied; sometimes it needs to be held by something that asks for nothing in return.

Neuroaesthetics and Emotional Reward

The field of neuroaesthetics studies how the brain responds to beauty, form, color, and aesthetic experience. When a person looks at art that genuinely resonates with them, the response is emotional, bodily, and deeply regulating, creating pleasure, recognition, calm, curiosity, or a sense of being returned to oneself. [3]

This internal chemistry serves as a distinct biological reward system, yet not all rewards are the same. Rewards triggered by digital notifications or professional validation are sharp, short-lived, and tied to external performance, often carrying anxiety.

In contrast, the reward of living with art is slower and becomes part of the emotional rhythm of a home. A cherished artwork functions as a reliable, screen-free source of visual and emotional nourishment — there in the morning, after a difficult call, or when the day has been too much. Over time, the work becomes not just something one owns but something one returns to, serving as an emotional anchor for the psyche.

Tactile Grounding and Sensory Reconnection

When professional output consists mostly of strategy, code, presentations, messages, or digital documentation, the psyche can become disconnected from the physical world. Artwork acts as a focal point of tangible reality. It is a dense artifact of human presence: hours of attention, gesture, physical labor, and emotional intensity held in canvas, paper, pigment, wood, or fabric.

The mind registers this differently from a screen image. An artwork carries imperfection, texture, weight, and trace, reminding the viewer that not everything meaningful is frictionless, editable, or instantly replaceable. A recent study by researchers from King’s College London and the Courtauld Institute of Art found that viewing original artworks was associated with a 22% reduction in cortisol, the body’s key stress hormone, compared with 8% for participants viewing reproductions. [4]

For a nervous system trained to live in digital abstraction, this physicality is grounding. It creates a visual and emotional boundary between the world of work and the world of recovery, quietly asserting: the digital workspace has ended. A different reality begins here.

Thus, if you are regularly exposed to stress and constant cognitive tension, start with one artwork your eye wants to return to.

Not necessarily the fashionable one. Not necessarily the expensive one. Just the one that visually gives you what you need right now: peace, energy, tenderness, courage, silence, or a sense of inner order.

Choose the work that changes your state at home.

In our upcoming articles, we will explore in detail how to choose art for the home to meet different psychological needs — and how to live with art under one roof happily ever after.

Take care.

Liste Art Fair Basel 2025, Image: Silke Briel, Courtesy Liste Art Fair Basel

Every June, the art world arrives in Basel. For one week, the city becomes a temporary capital of contemporary art: collectors, advisors, galleries, curators, and museum professionals—everyone gathers here.

If you follow art media, it is easy to assume that the Art Basel fair is exclusively a world of top-tier galleries like Gagosian, closing six-figure deals with elite collectors who then fly home on private jets. But that is only part of the story. Running concurrently is an equally vital event for the art market: Liste Art Fair Basel—an independent fair founded in 1996 and dedicated strictly to younger galleries and emerging artists. For a collector with a budget under €10,000, it is honestly the more interesting place to be.

Put simply, Art Basel is where you buy the artist everyone already knows. Liste is where you find the artist everyone will know in five years.

This year’s edition runs from June 15 to 21 at Messe Basel, Hall 1.1, featuring 106 galleries from 36 countries—the largest edition in Liste’s history.

Here is why Liste is specifically right for a collector with a budget under €10,000

• First — Down-to-earth pricing. Emerging galleries working with emerging artists price their works for collectors who are actually buying to live with art, not for hedge funds. Works in the €2,000–€8,000 range are accessible and genuinely excellent.

• Second — Direct access. At Art Basel, the best works are often pre-sold to institutional collectors before the doors even open. At Liste, you can walk in, talk directly to the gallerist, and acquire something extraordinary the same day.

• Third — The atmosphere. The vibe at Liste is inherently democratic. Even without a six-figure budget, you are a genuinely welcome guest in every booth. You often get the chance to meet the artists themselves while they are still accessible and grounded. It is an incredible experience of diving deep into the art world.

• Fourth — The right timing. Positioned just before and overlapping with Art Basel, Liste serves as the go-to destination for collectors, curators, and critics hunting for new talent and future stars. The people who shape the market are at Liste looking for what comes next. You can be there too.

A practical note:
If you are visiting Basel this week, we highly recommend going to Liste first—with a clear head, free from fatigue, and more importantly, without the imposter syndrome that whispers you need a million-dollar budget to own great art. Visit Art Basel afterwards for context and inspiration.

The art world will tell you that serious collecting happens only at the main fair. We disagree. Serious collecting happens where the artworks feel alive—not where they are treated merely as financial assets.

That is Liste.

Happy collecting.

There is a distinct, high-end anxiety that comes with the desire to buy art. In any other luxury market, having a few thousand euros makes you a celebrated client. In the art world, it often makes you feel like an uninvited guest at a very exclusive party.

If you have ever stared at a blank wall in your living room, opened Artsy, and immediately closed it out of sheer intimidation, you are not alone. The system is designed to feel opaque. But buying your first artwork, or starting a collection, is not an exam you need to pass. It is actually a very personal, intimate, and deeply rewarding ritual. You are buying art you will live with and see every day.

We structured the process of starting your art collection so that it feels both pragmatic and less intimidating.

Fisher Suite (Observer) by Leonhard Hurzlmeier, 2022

1. Define Why You Want to Buy Art

Before you look at a single canvas, you need to be honest with yourself about your motives. Are you buying because your new apartment has echoing, empty white walls? Are you looking for an emotional anchor — something that changes the energy of the room every time you walk in? Or are you quietly hoping this piece will fund your retirement in fifteen years as a financial asset?

There are no wrong answers here. As we explored in our previous guide, What Kind of Art Collector Are You?, understanding your dominant motivation is the only way to avoid buyer’s remorse. If you are an emotional collector, do not let an art advisor talk you into a cold, minimalist investment piece. Define your “why” first, and let it act as your financial shield.

2. Train Your Eye: Look at Too Much Art

Training your eye is necessary because it helps you understand what genuinely attracts you and holds your attention. It is not about “forming your taste” according to what you should like. Visual discovery — of both good and bad art — helps you understand your preferences more clearly and recognize what truly makes your heart beat faster.

You will begin to notice what you are drawn to. Do you respond more strongly to a particular material? Are you more attracted to form or color? Minimalism or expression? By looking at different kinds of art, you also begin to know yourself better.

It is wonderful if you have the opportunity to visit museums and galleries, but online discovery works well too. We will explain where and how to search for art below.

3. Shift Your Mindset From “Art Lover” to “Collector”

An art lover looks at a painting and thinks, “That’s beautiful.”

A collector looks at a painting and asks, “What do I feel — and why?”

Shifting into a collector’s mindset means looking more deeply and more consciously. Who is the artist, and what is their story? How does this specific work speak to your personality and your life? How will this piece become part of your everyday life at home?

Remember: you are no longer simply buying an individual object to fill a gap above the sofa. You are curating a personal visual library. You are building a collection you will interact with every day, and it should become a resource for the reason you started collecting in the first place.

4. Set Your Financial Framework

The biggest mistake beginners make is not setting a clear financial boundary. Without a framework, you will either buy nothing out of fear and exhaustion or overspend on overhyped nonsense.

Defining your comfortable spending range, most importantly, helps you focus your search. In the contemporary art market, price brackets usually work roughly like this: under $5,000, under $10,000, under $50,000, and above.

Let us reassure you right away: price is usually not a direct indicator of the quality of the work. We will discuss art pricing in the next essay, but for now, it is enough to know that for under $5,000 you can find a work no less powerful than one priced at $100,000.

Once you understand your approximate budget, you can search more deeply within that range. This will significantly increase your chances of finding what you need without compromising. So decide on your number, and stick to it.

5. Ignore the Trends

The contemporary art market thrives on artificial hype.

Galleries love to create waiting lists and synthetic scarcity around “trending” young artists to encourage panic-buying among new collectors.

Artists shoot reels to generate attention through likes.

Platforms like Artsy and Saatchi release their “curated lists.”

Sometimes all these promotional efforts are justified, but often they do not reflect the actual quality of the work. And even if the art is genuinely good, it may simply not be for you.

Ignore the noise. Trends are short-lived, and the artists heavily marketed today are often resold on the secondary market tomorrow. If a piece does not challenge you, comfort you, or spark a conversation, it does not matter how much hype surrounds it.

Trust your eye and your gut feeling, and buy for longevity.

6. Start the Hunt

Now that you are equipped with the essential recommendations of a beginner collector, it is time to start the hunt.

Your hunting strategy depends first of all on the price range you have chosen. In short, the higher the price — especially from around $10,000 and above — the more useful it becomes to involve an intermediary, such as a gallery, art dealer, or auction house, because legal and transactional details can become more complex. If your budget is around $5,000, buying independently is often completely reasonable.

Look for graduating MFA student exhibitions. Use social media to follow independent curators. Scout digital platforms not necessarily to buy immediately, but to track which independent artists are building consistent, authentic bodies of work. When you find an artist whose vision aligns with yours, buy directly or work with small, transparent galleries that actually respect your budget.

Building a collection is a slow game. Take your time, trust your taste, and remember: the art you live with should make you more.

Next week, we will look more closely at how to hunt well, the legal details of buying art, and how to negotiate a discount.

Happy collecting.

Untitled: 8, 2024 by Na Kim

It is usually assumed that finding and forming our sense of self is a deeply internal process. That we must first know ourselves well to feel confident, show up fully, and be in healthy contact with others.

Artist Na Kim looks at this process differently. And there is something important we can learn from her.

Kim was born in Seoul in 1986 and lives and works in Brooklyn, New York. Before gaining wider attention as a painter, she built a serious career in design, serving as Art Director of The Paris Review and Creative Director at Farrar, Straus and Giroux. In recent years, however, her painting practice has moved into sharper art-world focus.

Her debut solo presentation took place at White Columns, New York, in 2023. In 2024, she was included in The Selves at Nicola Vassell Gallery, and in 2025, Nicola Vassell presented Memory Palace, her first solo exhibition with the gallery. She has also shown at Art Basel Miami Beach and the Independent Art Fair.

This places Kim in an interesting position: still emerging as a painter, but already moving with serious institutional and gallery recognition.

Kim explores many themes, but today we want to focus on her Selves series, which is simply extraordinary. It consists of portraits of women rendered in bold, luminous colour where form is defined by contrast rather than line.

What makes her work compelling is not only her command of such complex colour relationships, though that alone is remarkable. It is her entire approach to portraiture.

Untitled: 6, 2024 by Na Kim

At first glance, it seems that Kim is painting herself, and there is genuinely some resemblance. But in her own words, this series is about “imagined personalities.” Through painting different states of a woman, she asks: how does personality actually form? How does a self come into being? Is it through actions, emotions, feelings? Through colour and form? What allows us to see ourselves more clearly — and to become visible to others?

And she seems to answer her own question: the self is not formed in isolation. It forms through contact.

Untitled: 14, 2024 by Na Kim

Kim’s figures always face the viewer. They shift in form, feeling, and mood, but they are always in contact with whoever is looking. Always in wordless dialogue. And we are actively drawn into it.

Not by drama, narrative, pity, or anger — none of the reliable triggers. And yet we stay.

Why?

Because we feel needed here. We become part of this woman’s inner process. She, even in a painting, requires our presence for something that is happening inside her. She does not ask, does not demand, does not manipulate. She simply exists and invites us to exist alongside her.

Untitled: 28, 2024 by Na Kim

This is Kim’s central idea: we come to know ourselves not only through our own inner experience but through the presence of another. Love, tenderness, fear, stubbornness, attentiveness, sadness — we feel these most fully as a resonance with someone who is looking at us. The feelings and reactions of the Other fill us and reveal what our own are capable of. More than we thought.

And that makes both of us more.

And perhaps this is the most important lesson of Kim’s work: the search for the self is not limited to the self alone. To be seen by ourselves and by others does not require action or performance.

Sometimes it requires only the ability to stay in contact.

Untitled: 8, 2026 by Na Kim

Man in a Bowler Hat, 1964 by René Magritte

This is particularly maddening for a new generation of collectors who have no time and make decisions impulsively — if I like it, I want to buy it right now.

But no. You have to submit an inquiry, wait for a response, and then, when someone finally calls you back, open with: “We would be delighted to know you better!”.

Seriously?

This feels especially absurd in 2025, when even luxury brands have learned to publish six-figure prices without a second thought. But when price mystification is practised around emerging or mid-career artists, where prices are far more accessible, it generates nothing but irritation.

So why does the art world still do it?

Firstly, pricing is sometimes not fixed and depends on a collector’s profile, artist momentum, geography, and demand. Think of it as a light version of a credit score. For galleries, it’s a way to understand how much you’re willing and able to pay.

Secondly, it’s manipulation. In the 21st century, there is still a belief that opacity creates exclusivity. The art world operates on the assumption that hidden prices make art feel like access to a private world — and you must pass an “interview” before the gallery decides at what “individually exclusive price” to sell you the work, as if purchasing a ticket into an elite club. My personal favourite is when they lean in with a mysterious, hypnotic voice: “Several other collectors are also interested in this piece.” So I’m supposed to fight for it? Really?

Just to remind you: we are living in the 21st century, and I want to spend €5,000 on an emerging artist, not €50 million on a Renaissance work of global cultural significance.

So, how to hack the system and avoid overpaying?

1. Ask for the price directly — and ask again.

Say it plainly: you don’t have time, or you simply don’t want to share personal information.

2. Contact the artist directly.

If the gallery contract isn’t exclusive, the artist may be able to sell to you directly. The specific work might not be available — but sometimes you’ll discover something you love even more. And buying directly from an artist is a remarkable experience. That is what real belonging to the art world actually feels like.

3. Don’t confuse Instagram hype with market validation.

Visibility is not the same thing as value. There are at least two ways to inflate a social media following artificially — and in the art world, those followers are often not the audience that matters. If you’re buying for love rather than investment, trust your own eye above all else.

4. Use public price databases before you buy.

Before committing to a gallery price, spend some time researching what the artist’s work has actually sold for at auction (Artnet platform, but with paid access) or check platforms like Artsy to look at the artist’s actual pricing. If a gallery is asking €8,000 for an artist whose average price is €5,000 — that’s a reason to question the gallery’s pricing.

5. Be cautious with hyped artists right now. We’ve usually been discovering an artist through social media algorithms — and often that means the moment has already passed and prices are at their peak. Either wait a few months for the hype to settle, or consider other artists entirely. Trust me: there are hundreds of genuinely talented painters who are worth exploring — ones untouched by the hysteria of likes and shares.

What’s most striking is that despite the art world’s constant rhetoric about needing new collectors, price transparency remains one of the biggest barriers to buying art.

Because of this old-school commitment to hidden pricing, it’s often the artists themselves who suffer most — waiting months for a sale simply because getting a price feels like applying to the CIA.

Challenging this dynamic is in the interest of both collectors and artists equally.

Happy collecting.

Zalfa Imani, Unsplash, 2025.

People often say they buy art because they “love art.” But love, it turns out, takes very different forms.

Some buy art the same way others buy stocks: studying market dynamics, investment potential, institutional support, and long-term liquidity. Others fill their apartments with blurred figurative paintings that perfectly match their designer lamps. Some collect art because it symbolises belonging to the seductive and mysterious art world.

The problem is that many people begin buying art before understanding what role they actually want art to play in their lives.

As a result, they often end up collecting someone else’s advice and desires: market trends instead of emotional resonance, status instead of meaning, expensive decoration instead of financial assets.

Understanding your motivation can fundamentally change your entire approach to buying art. It helps navigate the art market more intelligently, build a collecting strategy effectively, and avoid wasting time and money on overhyped nonsense.

And despite how mysterious the art world likes to appear, most collectors are usually driven by a small number of emotional, financial, and psychological motivations.

Jacob Hoferlin, Unsplash, 2025.

The Investor

For this type of collector, art is primarily an asset.

The emotional relationship with the work is secondary to questions of long-term value, market positioning, scarcity, and institutional support. These collectors pay close attention to auction history, museum recognition, blue-chip artists, and major galleries representing them.

There is often something surprisingly rational about this approach. While the art world romanticises collecting as something purely emotional, the reality is that art has long functioned as a financial ecosystem connected to wealth preservation, status, and speculation.

And in many ways, investors understand the mechanics of the market better than anyone else.

The Decorator

Some people buy art not because they want to “collect,” but because they want to live differently.

For them, art shapes atmosphere. It changes the emotional architecture of a home. A painting can soften a space, create tension, calm the mind, or completely alter how a room feels psychologically.

These collectors are often drawn toward colour, composition, texture, harmony, and scale. They care less about institutional prestige and more about how the work lives beside them every day.

This relationship with art is far more serious than the art world sometimes admits, because the spaces we inhabit inevitably shape our inner life.

The Status Collector

Art has always functioned as social language.

Long before Instagram, collectors used paintings, objects, and collections to communicate education, power, refinement, cultural access, and belonging. Contemporary art still performs this role extremely well.

These collectors are usually drawn toward recognisable names, fashionable galleries, highly visible artists, and works that already carry social validation. In many elite circles today, owning the “right” artist functions almost like wearing the right watch or entering the right private club.

The interesting thing is that this motivation is often hidden beneath the language of “taste.”

The Emotional Collector

This is perhaps the most instinctive type of collector.

These people buy art because something inside them reacts before logic has time to intervene.

They return to the same work multiple times. They think about paintings long after leaving the gallery. Certain artworks begin following them psychologically. Sometimes they buy pieces that make absolutely no financial sense — but they simply cannot imagine letting them go.

For emotional collectors, art is deeply personal, and this approach is becoming more relevant than ever. People are no longer searching just for beautiful objects—they are searching for meaning

The Legacy Builder

The rarest collectors are usually thinking beyond themselves entirely.

For them, collecting is not simply acquisition. It becomes legacy.

These collectors often support emerging artists (artists in the earlier stages of their careers), build long-term relationships with galleries and studios, and think carefully about coherence across decades rather than individual purchases.

They are not simply buying works they personally enjoy. They are building a memory of who they were. Often, every work inside such a collection reflects something about the collector’s own journey, character, obsessions, and values. The collection slowly becomes a psychological portrait of its owner — art as a reflection of identity.

Many of the world’s most important collections were built exactly like this.

Most people are never just one type of collector.

An investor can unexpectedly fall in love with a painting. A decorator can slowly become emotionally attached to certain artists. A status collector may eventually begin searching for something more personal and meaningful.

People also move between motivations throughout their lives.

Understanding your dominant motivation can change your entire approach to collecting. Different types of collectors require different strategies, different sources, and often completely different relationships with the market itself.

The more expensive the artwork, the more pragmatic the motivation behind the purchase — and the more intermediaries enter the process: advisors, galleries, consultants, auction specialists, private dealers. Not simply as sellers, but as mechanisms of validation, risk reduction, and investment credibility.

So, reflect on your relationship with art, because the real difference between good collectors and bad ones is not knowledge, money, or access — but self-awareness.

Pieter Bruegel the Elder’s The Tower of Babel (1563)

Let’s not rub salt into the wound — you are probably already well aware that the modern world now resembles the Tower of Babel more than ever. We are building our castles higher and higher, already reaching into space, but along the way, we are losing the skill of human contact, not only with others but with ourselves.

What does art have to do with this, you may ask?

During the COVID pandemic, attendance at physical museums plummeted due to lockdowns, while virtual tours, online collections, and art lectures experienced explosive growth. During other periods of crisis, for instance, after 9/11 in the US, many museums also noted increased attendance. In moments of individual or collective stress and adversity, art becomes a place to process these experiences and find at least temporary relief.

Why does this happen?

Why, when we look at art, do we stop breathing, or our eyes fill with tears, or, on the contrary, we feel a surge of energy and trembling excitement…?

Art critics or art historians are unlikely to be able to answer these questions for you. Such reactions are too visceral, too personal, to be framed by historical facts or explained through context, technique, or genre. It feels more like a psychological response than an appreciation of mastery.

When our external and internal worlds descend into chaos, and the future seems uncertain, our intuitive pull toward art follows deep psychological patterns. What are we unconsciously looking for?

1. Restoration of Balance and Stability in Chaos

In times of uncertainty, the psyche seeks order where it can still be found.

The museum itself, with its familiar route, silence, and schedule, becomes a model of an ordered world.

And a painting with a clear, resolved composition provides the brain with the very visual and semantic anchor it desperately needs.

This is an act of mental self-soothing through structure.

2. Relief and Containment of Unbearable Emotions

Our own emotions in a crisis can feel intolerable because they are formless and all-consuming.

Art gives them form and boundaries. It transforms personal anxiety, grief, or anger into an object that can be observed from the outside.

This is my pain; this is what it looks like. I still feel it, but it’s no longer just inside me. I can look at it from the outside, and it already hurts a little less.

This is the psychological mechanism of containment, where the artwork acts as a safe vessel for feelings.

3. Searching for an Exit and a Different Perspective

When we feel trapped, we look for a window into another reality. Art is precisely that window.

It doesn’t make empty promises that tomorrow will be easier. It shows that “otherwise” is possible in principle.

The tender domesticity in a Vermeer interior, the expansive, untroubled skies in a Constable landscape, or the serene weightlessness of figures in a Raphael fresco — these are alternative worlds that exist here and now.

They remind us: your inner landscape can also be organised according to these — more peaceful, spacious, or sublime — laws.

4. Restoring Dulled Sensitivity

Routine and chronic stress act as anaesthesia.

We stop noticing shades of colour, the complexity of textures, the subtle movements of the soul. Art becomes a training ground for sensation.

It teaches us again to see and feel, engaging neural pathways abandoned in survival mode. We leave a museum not just with new thoughts, but with renewed organs of perception, capable of finding beauty and meaning even in the small.

5. Spiritual Growth and Connection to Eternity

Time flows differently in a museum. Next to a portrait painted five centuries ago, our momentary anxieties lose their absolute significance. We feel ourselves part of the long human story — a story of suffering, the search for beauty, inquiry, and overcoming. This doesn’t diminish our personal pain but places it in a different, universal perspective. We are not alone; we are a link in the chain. And this knowledge provides not naive hope, but existential resilience — the deepest and most unshakable foundation possible.

Thus, our encounter with art is a complex, often unconscious act of psychological self-regulation.

When we are in a state of psychological instability, we can use art as a precise tool: for structuring inner chaos, giving form to vague feelings, searching for alternative models of being, rehabilitating our own perception, and gaining spiritual scale.

We truly hope that life will be kind enough to spare you from needing art as a remedy for pain.

But if the moment comes, consider walking into the nearest museum or gallery. Or simply open the Instagram page of an artist who makes your heart tremble.

Frederic Leighton’s Flaming June (1895).

Take care.

Nocturnal animals, oil on canvas, 2025

Based in Riga, Frolova works primarily with oil painting.

What we see in Katya Frolova’s work is colour fighting against form, as if an enormous amount of energy has been trapped inside the body. An energy of vitality, sexuality, and emotional intensity, but at the same time of fear, uncertainty, and vulnerability. Everything that makes us feel alive.

But it seems as though this energy is afraid of itself. It has already outgrown its own bodily boundaries, yet still cannot break outside to experience itself beyond inner confinement.

That is why, in her paintings, everything seems to vibrate and radiate from a place of internal pressure and emotional claustrophobia. It simply does not have enough space within.

This inner tension is exhausting. The energy begins consuming itself, burning through the form that makes physical presence and action impossible.

And that is what makes Frolova’s work feel so powerful, it becomes a visual reminder: strong inner energy must find liberation — or it turns against itself. Creation or destruction.

What do you choose?

Mermaid, oil on canvas, 2025

Untitled, oil on canvas, 2025

Forget-me-not, oil on canvas, 2025

Marie, oil on canvas, 2025

Every two years, the art world gathers in Venice for its most prestigious ritual: the Venice Biennale.

Officially, the exhibition runs for over six months. In reality, the industry arrives for the exclusive three-day Preview Week (the Vernissage) where collectors, curators, dealers, advisors, and everyone lucky enough to secure an invitation gather together. These days are dedicated to making the hottest deals, building connections, and simply gossiping.

Artists are there, too, of course. The established ones pitch new “ambitious” projects over cocktails. The emerging ones stand quietly with champagne glasses in hand, desperately hoping the galleries’ marketing investments in them will pay off and their contracts will be renewed.

The Biennale, and contemporary art in general, likes to position itself as a reflection of the modern world. This year, it succeeded almost too well.

The entire event became a perfect Black Mirror of the current global geopolitical and moral disaster. Russia, being cancelled and sanctioned almost everywhere else, still has its own pavilion, generating even more publicity through controversy alone. Ukraine and its supporters, with little success, respond with outrage and protest performances. America, historically convinced of its role as the global architect of justice and humanitarian values, dominates the moral atmosphere of the event, aggressively exporting its ideological framework by threatening cancellation for almost anything if you are not considered “moral enough” — even when it concerns one of its own artists (our sincere condolences to Alma Allen).

The spaces of the Biennale no longer revolve around artistic depth. They revolve around statements, optics, trends, ideology, and institutional signalling. It sounds almost ridiculous, but art increasingly feels secondary here to the performance surrounding it.

And that raises an inevitable question: Where exactly is the art in all of this?

Perhaps you did not miss it because the art simply was not there, just like you were not.

Art in Venice has been drowned by a total fear of standing by truth and personal values, without which real art cannot exist. Speaking honestly without fearing exclusion from the current, quite literally empty dialogue. Reminding people of what actually matters.

The industry constantly demands change in its endless fight for attention and relevance, yet remains strangely silent about the global crisis slowly eroding its own strategic foundation:

Art itself.

But the contemporary art industry no longer seems interested in that responsibility.

Because meaning is risky. Beauty is suspicious. Integrity is boring. And depth performs poorly online.

The tragic figures in this story are the artists themselves.

Many still carry the old romantic belief that genuine talent will eventually be recognised. Even after years inside the system, they continue working in small studios, stretching impossible budgets, doubting themselves, producing work under relentless economic pressure while hoping the next exhibition, the next curator, or the next collector might finally change their lives.

And during events like the Biennale, many stand silently with champagne in hand while their “serving” industry decides whether their inner world is commercially, politically, or socially acceptable enough to deserve visibility.

Yet fortunately, real art has never depended entirely on Venice.

Good art still survives far away from institutional spotlights. It lives in independent studios across the world — in apartments, co-livings, and forgotten workshops. In exhausted painters working after midnight. In artists who continue making things not because the market asked for them, but because they are still trying to understand something essential about being alive.

That is the Art worth looking for.